Does the background and the illuminant interfere with the color selection of natural teeth? An integrative review of clinical studies

Autores

  • Walleska Liberato UFF
  • Karla Miyahira
  • Daniele Masterson Ferreira
  • Ângela Scarparo Caldo-Teixeira
  • Sinval Adalberto Rodrigues-Junior
  • Lucianne Cople Maia
  • Larissa Maria Assad Cavalcante

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59483/rfpp.v3n4.95

Palavras-chave:

Shade selection; Color selection; Background; Illuminant; Polarization filter

Resumo

Background: Visual shade selection is subjective and influenced by exterior factors. Different auxiliary devices, such as specific background, illuminant and polarization filter have been developed aiding at the achievement of better esthetic results. This integrative review aimed to determine whether these devices interfere in shade match of natural teeth.  Materials and methods: Electronic searches were performed with no language or date restrictions, based on the research question “Does the background and the illuminant interfere with the color selection of natural teeth?” In vivo studies that compared visual selection on natural teeth under different background and illuminants were included. Quality assessment and bias control were carried out according to Fowkes and Fulton guidelines and Quadas 2. Study screening, appraisal and data extraction were performed in duplicate, independent and blind fashion. Data were analyzed and presented descriptively. Protocol registration no. CRD42019124437. Results: Screening of studies led to 8 final studies out of 1932 references. Observers for shade match were dental students, dentists, lay people, post-graduate students, research assistants and dental professors. Two studies involved tab-to-tab shade match, while the others assessed shade in human volunteers. No study assessed the effect of background color. Varying alternatives of light were tested, including room lights and hand-held correcting lights. The results were expressed as proportion of visual-instrumental agreement, ∆E* and weighted kappa, and were conflicting as to the effect of lighting on shade match. Risk of bias was identified mainly due to lack of blinding. Conclusions: Illumination influenced differently the shade matching performances. The effect of background color is still to be determined. Therefore, additional well-designed studies are required to further elucidate the role of illuminant and background color on shade matching performance. Clinical significance: This study may guide further required studies on dental shade matching. Moreover, it can help clinicians to improve their daily dental practice to achieve greater predictability and longevity of restorative and aesthetic dental treatments.

Referências

Burgt T, Bosch J, Kortsmit WJPM, Borsboom PCF. A comparison quantification of new and conventional of tooth color. Methods. 1990;63(2):155-162.

Mohammed AO, Mohammed GS, Mathew M, Alzarea B, Bandela V. Shade Selection in Esthetic Dentistry: A Review. Cureus. 2022;14(3):3-7. doi:10.7759/cureus.23331

Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-De-Souza FH, et al. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dental Materials. 2015;31(10):1214-1224. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005

Yoon HI, Bae JW, Park JM, Chun YS, Kim MA, Kim M. A Study on Possibility of Clinical Application for Color Measurements of Shade Guides Using an Intraoral Digital Scanner. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018;27(7):670-675. doi:10.1111/jopr.12559

Igiel C, Lehmann KM, Ghinea R, et al. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2017;29(5):303-308. doi:10.1111/jerd.12321

Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2009;101(3):193-199. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60028-7

Jouhar R, Ahmed MA, Khurshid Z. An Overview of Shade Selection in Clinical Dentistry. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2022;12(14). doi:10.3390/app12146841

Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, et al. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2012;43(8):649-659. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3224-z

Chu S, Devigus A, Mieleszko A. Fundamentals of Color: Shade Matching and Communication in Esthetic Dentistry. Journal ofProsthodontics. 2005;14(4):290-292. doi:10.1109/mcom.2006.1607856

Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and Instrumental Colorimetric Assessments of Small Color Differences on Translucent Dental Porcelain. J Dent Res. 1989;68(12):1760-1764. doi:10.1177/00220345890680120801

Poljak-Guberina R, Celebic A, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Colour discrimination of dental professionals and colour deficient laypersons. J Dent. 2011;39(SUPPL. 3):e17-e22. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.09.008

Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38(SUPPL. 2):2-16. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001

Fairchild MD. Color appearance models and complex visual stimuli. J Dent. 2010;38(SUPPL. 2):25-33. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.008

Bergen SF, Paravina RD. Color Education and Training in Dentistry: A First-Hand Perspective. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2017;29(2):E3-E5. doi:10.1111/jerd.12294

Clary JA, Ontiveros JC, Cron SG, Paravina RD. Influence of light source, polarization, education, and training on shade matching quality. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2016;116(1):91-97. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.008

Liberato WF, Barreto C, Costa P, Almeida CC de, Pimentel W, Tiossi R. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019;Feb;121(2):271-275. doi:S0022391318303664

Gasparik C, Grecu AG, Culic B, Badea ME, Dudea D. Shade-matching performance using a new light-correcting device. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2015;27(5):285-292. doi:10.1111/jerd.12150

Najafi-abrandabadi S, Janal MN. Effects of a shade-matching light and background color on reliability in tooth shade selection. Published online 2018:198-206.

Fani G, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Spectrophotometric and visual shade measurements of human teeth using three shade guides. Am J Dent. 2007;20(3):142-146.

Curd FM, Jasinevicius TR, Graves A, Cox V, Sadan A. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published online 2006. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.001

Dudea D, Gasparik C, Botos A, Alb F, Irimie A, Paravina RD. Influence of background/surrounding area on accuracy of visual color matching. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;20(6):1167-1173. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1620-3

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Fowkes FG, Fulton PM. Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines. 1991;302(May):1136-1140.

Whiting PF;, Rutjes AWS;, Westwood ME;, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(4):529-536.

Śmielecka M, Dorocka-Bobkowska B. Effects of different light sources on tooth shade selection. Dent Med Probl. 2020;57(1):61-66. doi:10.17219/dmp/114112

Reyes J, Acosta P, Ventura D. Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching. Heliyon. 2019;5(7):e02100. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02100

della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: Three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols. Dental Materials. 2009;25(2):276-281. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.006

Baharin SA, Dong TY, Jing TW. Anterior tooth shade selection procedure: Influence of light sources and patient’s position. Sains Malays. 2013;42(1):7-11.

Chitrarsu VK, Chidambaranathan AS, Balasubramaniam M. Analysis of Shade Matching in Natural Dentitions Using Intraoral Digital Spectrophotometer in LED and Filtered LED Light Sources. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017;12:1-6. doi:10.1111/jopr.12665

Yılmaz B, Irmak Ö, Yaman BC. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2019;(June):1-8. doi:10.1111/jerd.12507

Pimental W, Tiossi R. Comparison between visual and instrumental methods for natural tooth shade matching. Gen Dent. 2014;62(6):47-49.

della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: Three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols. Dental Materials. 2009;25(2):276-281. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.006

O’Brien WJ, Hemmendinger H, Boenke KM, Linger JB, Groh CL. Color distribution of three regions of extracted human teeth. Dent Mater. 1997;13(3):179-185. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80121-2

van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PCF, Kortsmit WJPM. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(2):155-162. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X

Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Difference in the colour and colour change of dental resin composites by the background. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(3):227-233. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01402.x

Schmeling Max. Color Selection and Reproduction in Dentistry Part 2: Light Dynamics in Natural Teeth. Published online 2016:23-40.

Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ, Lua MJR. Interdependence of the Hue, Value, and Chroma in the Middle Site of Anterior Human Teeth. Journal of Prosthodontics. 1994;3(4):188-192. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00153.x

Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and Instrumental Colorimetric Assessments of Small Color Differences on Translucent Dental Porcelain. J Dent Res. 1989;68(12):1760-1764. doi:10.1177/00220345890680120801

Klinke TU, Olms C, Pirek P, Jakstat HA, Hannak WB. Influence of tongue position on the determination of tooth shade. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2017;117(2):289-293. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.012

Alomari M, Chadwick RG. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides. Br Dent J. 2011;211(11):528-529. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.1030

Nakhaei M, Ghanbarzadeh J, Amirinejad S, Alavi S, Rajatihaghi H. The influence of dental shade guides and experience on the accuracy of shade matching. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2016;17(1):22-26. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1797

Kröger E, Matz S, Dekiff M, Tran BL, Figgener L, Dirksen D. In vitro comparison of instrumental and visual tooth shade determination under different illuminants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2015;114(6):848-855. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.004

Jasinevicius TR, Curd FM, Schilling L, Sadan A. Shade-matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light Source. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2009;18(1):60-63. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00376.x

Downloads

Publicado

20-12-2023

Como Citar

1.
Liberato W, Miyahira K, Masterson Ferreira D, Scarparo Caldo-Teixeira Ângela, Adalberto Rodrigues-Junior S, Cople Maia L, Maria Assad Cavalcante L. Does the background and the illuminant interfere with the color selection of natural teeth? An integrative review of clinical studies. RFPP [Internet]. 20º de dezembro de 2023 [citado 21º de novembro de 2024];3(4). Disponível em: https://revista.facpp.edu.br/index.php/rfpp/article/view/95

Edição

Seção

Artigos